| Title |
Persistent endotheliopathy in the pathogenesis of long COVID syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jth.15490 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Fogarty, Liam Townsend, Hannah Morrin, Azaz Ahmad, Claire Comerford, Ellie Karampini, Hanna Englert, Mary Byrne, Colm Bergin, Jamie M. O’Sullivan, Ignacio Martin‐Loeches, Parthiban Nadarajan, Ciaran Bannan, Patrick W. Mallon, Gerard F. Curley, Roger J.S. Preston, Aisling M. Rehill, Dennis McGonagle, Cliona Ni Cheallaigh, Ross I. Baker, Thomas Renné, Soracha E. Ward, James S. O’Donnell, the Irish COVID‐19 Vasculopathy Study investigators, Niamh O’Connell, Kevin Ryan, Dermot Kenny, Judicael Fazavana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 662 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 64 | 10% |
| United States | 48 | 7% |
| Ireland | 30 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 4% |
| Spain | 11 | 2% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| Austria | 9 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 8 | 1% |
| Japan | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 59 | 9% |
| Unknown | 387 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 576 | 87% |
| Scientists | 48 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 226 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 112 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 122 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 967. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,416
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis
#2
of 4,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#676
of 436,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.